<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: what lens are suitable for shooting photo diamond jewelry?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diamondjewelryblog.net/2007/06/11/what-lens-are-suitable-for-shooting-photo-diamond-jewelry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diamondjewelryblog.net/2007/06/11/what-lens-are-suitable-for-shooting-photo-diamond-jewelry/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: vienna2001</title>
		<link>http://diamondjewelryblog.net/2007/06/11/what-lens-are-suitable-for-shooting-photo-diamond-jewelry/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>vienna2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diamondjewelryblog.net/2007/06/11/what-lens-are-suitable-for-shooting-photo-diamond-jewelry/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Of the above I'd go for the 105 f2.8. Good working range and good for general use as well.

If you're shooting for online auction, you might consider a consumer-grade zoom with a macro setting, as screen resolution and file size reduction will dumb down the image anyway.

As for lighting, go for a light tent. Google it and you'll see a bajillion of them.

Hope this helps and good shooting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the above I&#8217;d go for the 105 f2.8. Good working range and good for general use as well.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re shooting for online auction, you might consider a consumer-grade zoom with a macro setting, as screen resolution and file size reduction will dumb down the image anyway.</p>
<p>As for lighting, go for a light tent. Google it and you&#8217;ll see a bajillion of them.</p>
<p>Hope this helps and good shooting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pooky</title>
		<link>http://diamondjewelryblog.net/2007/06/11/what-lens-are-suitable-for-shooting-photo-diamond-jewelry/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Pooky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diamondjewelryblog.net/2007/06/11/what-lens-are-suitable-for-shooting-photo-diamond-jewelry/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>These were taken with Canon 5D with Canon 100 mm f 2.8 Macro. 

I have never taken a photo of an object that small, but if you want a life size photo (or larger), the only choice you have is the MP-E 65 mm f 2.8. 

I am guessing a softbox. I am sorry I have no experience with the lighting (I used available light for the photo of the candle-shape of a flower, and strobes for the food photos.) 

The Canon 100 mm f 2.8 Macro lets you focus to 1:1, and so is the much more expensive 180 mm one. You'll have plenty of room to work with the 180 mm, that's for sure. 

Hope this help a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These were taken with Canon 5D with Canon 100 mm f 2.8 Macro. </p>
<p>I have never taken a photo of an object that small, but if you want a life size photo (or larger), the only choice you have is the MP-E 65 mm f 2.8. </p>
<p>I am guessing a softbox. I am sorry I have no experience with the lighting (I used available light for the photo of the candle-shape of a flower, and strobes for the food photos.) </p>
<p>The Canon 100 mm f 2.8 Macro lets you focus to 1:1, and so is the much more expensive 180 mm one. You&#8217;ll have plenty of room to work with the 180 mm, that&#8217;s for sure. </p>
<p>Hope this help a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

